Chhattisgarh High Court

WPS/2288/2018 of DURGA PRASAD SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CGHC010078692018 2026:CGHC:43543 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2288 of 2018 Durga Prasad Sahu S/o Shri B. P. Sahu Aged About 51 Years R/o Deendayal Nagar, Gwalior, Police Station- Gwalior, District- Gwalior Madhya Pradesh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh

CGHC010078692018

2026:CGHC:43543

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPS No. 2288 of 2018

Durga Prasad Sahu S/o Shri B. P. Sahu Aged About 51 Years R/o Deendayal Nagar, Gwalior, Police Station- Gwalior, District- Gwalior Madhya Pradesh.

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department of Commerce And Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2 - Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited Through Managing Director, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3 - Madhya Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation, Through Managing Director, I.I.D.C. Plaza 39, City Centre, Gwalior, Gwalior Region, District- Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. (As Per Hon’ble Court Order Dated 17-06-2025)

... Respondents

For Petitioner

:

Mr. S.P. Kale, Advocate.

For State

:

Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

For Res. No. 2

:

Mr. Ayaz Naved, Advocate.

For Res. No. 3

:

Mr. Gourang Dubey, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice

Narendra Kumar Vyas

Order on Board

/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the instant petition may kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make representation before the concerned authority raising his grievance.

2. Prayer is allowed.

3. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. In the eventuality of filing of representation by the petitioner before the concerned authority, the same shall be decided by the concerned authority as early as possible in accordance with law. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge -

Arun

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead