Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/9462/2026 of LOKESH @ LUCKY Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 6 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43452 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9462 of 2026 Lokesh @ Lucky S/o. Shiv Kumar Kashyap Aged About 35 Years R/o -Village Mahamaya Para, Jarhagaon, Police Station - Jarhagaon, Dist. -Mungeli (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The
CGHC010388312026
2026:CGHC:43452
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 9462 of 2026
Lokesh @ Lucky S/o. Shiv Kumar Kashyap Aged About 35 Years R/o -Village Mahamaya Para, Jarhagaon, Police Station - Jarhagaon, Dist. -Mungeli
(C.G.)
... Applicant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station - Jarhagaon, District -Mungeli (C.G.)
... Respondent
For Applicant
:
Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate
For Respondent
:
Ms. Anuradha Jain, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mr. Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 07/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 32/2026 registered at Police Station Jarhagaon, District Mungeli (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 21(b) of the NDPS Act.
2. The earlier bail application filed by the applicant, bearing MCRC No. 5980 of 2026, was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 21.08.2026.
3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that out of 17 prosecution witnesses, 11 witnesses have already been examined and the case is now listed for further evidence of the prosecution witnesses from 5th October to 7th October, 2026.
4. Considering the fact that only 6 witnesses are to be examined and the trial is at final stage and also considering the fact that there is no justifiable ground to consider the present bail application at this stage as trial is about to completion.
5. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant bail application at this stage.
6. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed.
Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge Arpan