Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/151/2024 of KARTIKESHWAR PATEL Vs SMT. BHAGWATI PATEL on 6 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43539 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 151 of 2024 1 - Kartikeshwar Patel S/o Late Shri Ramcharan Patel , Aged About 58 Years R/o Village-Lohrindipa, Tahsil-Basna, District-Mahasamund (Cg) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Bhagwati Patel D/o Late Shri
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CGHC010051812024
2026:CGHC:43539
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 151 of 2024 1 - Kartikeshwar Patel S/o Late Shri Ramcharan Patel , Aged About 58 Years R/o Village-Lohrindipa, Tahsil-Basna, District-Mahasamund (Cg)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Bhagwati Patel D/o Late Shri Thakur Ram Patel, 2 - Prahlad Patel S/o Shri Nakul Ram Patel, 3 - Indrajeet Patel S/o Shri Nakul Ram Patel, 4 - Govind Ram Patel S/o Shri Nakul Ram Patel, 5 - Heeralal Patel S/o Shri Nakul Ram Patel All are R/o Village -Lohrindipa, Tahsil-Basna, District-Mahasamund (CG)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Pal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 07/10/2026 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the concerned Revenue Authority by filing an application afresh, raising all his grievances. It is submitted that, in such an eventuality, the concerned Revenue Authority may be directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, without being influenced by the order passed by the SDO, Revenue Saraipali, dated 31.10.2014, the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division, dated 14.07.2021, and the order passed by the Chhattisgarh Board of Revenue, Bilaspur, Circuit Court at Raipur, dated 28.11.2023.
2. The aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner has been opposed by learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for. In the event the petitioner files an application afresh before the concerned Revenue Authority, the said authority shall consider and decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law, without being influenced by the orders passed by the SDO, Revenue Saraipali, the Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division, as well as the Chhattisgarh Board of Revenue, Bilaspur, Circuit Court at Raipur, dated 28.11.2023, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge