Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4936/2026 of SHUBHANKAR JAISWAL Vs THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY on 6 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43354 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4936 of 2026 1 - Shubhankar Jaiswal S/o Shri Shyam Narayan Jaiswal Aged About 37 Years R/o Ward No. 9, Shanti Nagar, Pali, Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Regional Transport Authority Indravati Bhawan, Atal
CGHC010381212026
2026:CGHC:43354
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4936 of 2026
1 - Shubhankar Jaiswal S/o Shri Shyam Narayan Jaiswal Aged About 37
Years R/o Ward No. 9, Shanti Nagar, Pali, Korba (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - The Regional Transport Authority Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Hariom Rai, P.L., appears on advance copy SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the present petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to case of petitioner. RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV
10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set- aside the impugned order dated 23.07.2026 and direct the respondent to consider and decide the application of petitioner for grant of permanent stage carriage on the rout, in compliance of provision under Sub Section 2 of Section 80 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in favour of petitioner, may also be granted.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the concerned STAT, and further prays that the concerned STAT be directed to consider the same and, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a specified period.
3. No objection has been raised from the other side.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT) within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the event that the petitioner approaches the concerned STAT within the aforesaid period, the STAT shall consider and decide the claim/grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of 60 days, after giving notice to all the objectors. CC as per rules. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi