Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5481/2022 of AMITENDRA NATH DUBEY Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 6 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43547 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5481 of 2022 1 - Amitendra Nath Dubey S/o Shri Vijendra Nath Dubey Aged About 30 Years R/o Rohinipuram Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Arun Swami S/o Late Rang Nath Swami Aged About 64 Years R/o Rohinipuram Colony,
CGHC010397982022
2026:CGHC:43547
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5481 of 2022
1 - Amitendra Nath Dubey S/o Shri Vijendra Nath Dubey Aged About 30
Years
R/o
Rohinipuram
Colony,
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
2 - Arun Swami S/o Late Rang Nath Swami Aged About 64 Years R/o Rohinipuram Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Priayranjan Pandey S/o Shri Ram Bachan Pandey Aged About 46
Years R/o Rohinipuram Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Commissioner Raipur Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Naib Tahsildar Tahsil Navapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Nirmala Bai D/o Late Shri Vinayak Rao Aged About 61 Years Rajim, P. S. Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Usha Kiran S/o Vinayak Rao R/o Village Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Kamla Bai W/o Vinayak Rao R/o Village Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Digitally
signed by
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
7 - Rajesh Kumar S/o Vinayak Rao R/o Village Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 8 - Smt. Vaishali D/o Vinayak Rao R/o Quarter No. 8/79/5 Difference Project Amba Jhari Nagpur (M.
H.)
9 - Smt. Shakuntala D/o Vinayak Rao R/o Near Chandak Building Public School Nagpur (M.
H.)
10 - Pushplata Joshi D/o Vinayak Rao R/o Village Dhawalpur, Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 11 - Smt. Chandrakala D/o Vinayak Rao R/o Handipara Tahsil And District Raipur 12 - Shri Laxmi Narayan Mandir Kuhkuha Through Manager Smt.
Kamla Bai R/o Tahsil Rajim Gariyaband Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: None.
For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A.
For Respondents No. 5 to
: Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Renu Kochar.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On 25.09.2026 none appears for the petitioner to argue the case and today when the matter is called none appears for the petitioner to argue the case, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in this case.
2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat