Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1465/2026 of ALOK TRIVEDI Vs RAMESH KUMAR NISHAD on 6 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43513 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1465 of 2026 • Alok Trivedi S/o Late K. S. Trivedi Aged About 56 Years R/o Karamchari Colony, Ward No 01, Bhanupratappur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus • Ramesh Kumar Nishad S/o
CGHC010371052026
2026:CGHC:43513
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT
No.
1465
of 2026
•
Alok Trivedi S/o Late K. S. Trivedi Aged About 56 Years R/o Karamchari Colony, Ward No 01, Bhanupratappur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
•
Ramesh Kumar Nishad S/o Late Lacchindar Nishad Posted As District Education Officer (Deo) In Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.)
... Respondent
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Anand Kumar Pandey, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
07/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure C-
1) passed in WPS No. 3374/2026. He submits that though the decision on the representation submitted by petitioner has been taken by the District Education Officer, however, the decision is erroneous and is not to the tune of the observation made in the said order passed in writ petition. He also submits that against the order Annexure C-3 dated 07.08.2026 passed by the District Education Officer, a writ petition has already been filed.
2. In view of aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, further considering that the District Education Officer has already taken a decision on the representation submitted by petitioner pursuant to the order passed in the writ petition, no contempt would lie.
3. Accordingly, this contempt petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn