Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5083/2026 of MADKAMI PANDU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 6 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43387 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5083 of 2026 1 - Madkami Pandu S/o. Hadma, Aged About 67 Years R/o. House No. 34, Ganjenar (Bantupara), Tehsil Chindgarh Kawasiras, P.O. Kodripal District Sukma (C.G.) 2 - Ayata Kawasi, D/o. Mudha, Age About R/o.
CGHC010388272026
2026:CGHC:43387
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5083 of 2026
1 - Madkami Pandu S/o. Hadma, Aged About 67 Years R/o. House No. 34, Ganjenar (Bantupara), Tehsil Chindgarh Kawasiras, P.O. Kodripal District Sukma (C.G.)
2 - Ayata Kawasi, D/o. Mudha, Age About R/o. Village- Ganjenar (Bantupara), Tehsil Chindgarh District Sukma (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Sukma, Diistrict -Sukma
(C.G.)
Superintendent Of Police, Sukma, District -Sukma (C.G.)
3 - The Sub- Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Sukma, District -Sukma (C.G.)
Tehsildar, Chhindgarh, Sukma, Diistrict -Sukma (C.G.)
5 - Station House Officer, Chhindgarh, Sukma, District -Sukma (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Vivek Mishra, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Anil S. Pandey, G.A.
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI
YADAV
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the present petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:- “1] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in nature of Mandamus, strictly directing the respondent authorities to initiate proceedings with regards to complaints submitted by the petitioners, in the interest of justice. 2] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant suitable compensation in lieu of the loss of crops and illegal dispossession of all the petitioners from their agricultural land during the cropping season, in the larger interest of justice. 3] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the imposition of cost upon the respondent authorities responsible to act on receiving the complaints of the petitioners, in the interest of justice. 4] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a duly constituted fresh petition.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State submits that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and there being no objection on behalf of the respondent/State, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi