Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/699/2026 of PRAVIN KUMAR MISHRA Vs SHREE KUMAR MISHRA on 6 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43541 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 699 of 2026 1 - Pravin Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra Aged About 46 Years Address Of All The Petitioners R/o Mangla Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. 2 - Smt, Mamta
CGHC010226532026
2026:CGHC:43541
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 699 of 2026
1 - Pravin Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra Aged About 46
Years Address Of All The Petitioners R/o Mangla Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.
2 - Smt, Mamta Tiwari D/o Late Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra Aged About 56
Years R/o Mangla Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.
3 - Smt, Shraddha Deewan D/o Late Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra Aged About 54 Years R/o Mangla Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.
4 - Smt, Sangeeta Sharma D/o Late Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra Aged About 52 Years R/o Mangla Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.
5 - Smt, Rani @ Mukti Tiwari D/o Late Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra Aged About 43 Years R/o Mangla Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.
6 - Smt Kaveri Mishra W/o Late Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra Aged About 76
Years R/o Mangla Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Shree Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Pushkar Prasad Mishra Aged About 67
Years R/o Village Seepat Tehsil Masturi District Bilaspur C.G.
2 - Ashwani Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Pushkar Prasad Mishra Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Seepat Tehsil Masturi District Bilaspur C.G.
3 - Anil Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Pushkar Mishra Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Seepat Tehsil Masturi District Bilaspur C.G.
4 - Smt, Usha Tiwari D/o Lati Shri Pushkar Prasad Mishra Aged About 66
Years R/o Ganganagar Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.
5 - Smt, Nisha Pandey D/o Late Shri Pushkar Prasad Mishra Aged About 62
Years W/o Shri Pramod Pandey R/o Jamnipali Korba District Korba C.G.
6 - Chandrashekhar Mishra S/o Late Shri Bhawani Prasad Mishra Aged About 75 Years R/o Seepat Tehsil Masturi District Bilaspur C.G.
7 - Santosh Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Bhawani Prasad Mishra Aged About 72 Years R/o Chantapara Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.
8 - Smt, Shashi Mishra W/o Late Shri Ramesh Kumar Mishra Aged About 50
Years (Ramesh Mishra Was Son Of Late Shri Bhawani Prasad Mishar ) R/o Chantapara Bilaspur District Bilaspur C.G.
9 - Ku. Kajal Mishra D/o Late Shri Ramesh Kumar Mishra Aged About 25
Years (Ramesh Mishra Was Son Of Late Bhawani Prasad Mishra ) R/o Chantapara Bilaspur District Bilaspur C.G.
10 - Ku. Kiran Mishra D/o Late Shri Ramesh Kumar Mishra Aged About 24
Years (Ramesh Mishra Was Son Of Late Shri Bhawani Prasad Mishra) R/o Chantapara District Bilaspur C.G.
11 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur C.G.
12 - Smt, Parag Yadav D/o Late Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra Aged About 50
Years W/o Shri Anil Yadav R/o Ashok Nagar Sarkanda Bilaspur District Bilaspur C.G.Mo. No.7869962080.
... Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 4, 7, 8, 9, 10
and 12
: Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate.
For State
: Mr. Siddhant Tiwari, Panel Lawyer.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board
07/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that during the pendency of the petition, the civil suit has been decided by the learned trial Court and, therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous and the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition.
2. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok