Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1307/2024 of ALOK MANDAL Vs SMT. PRIYANKA MOHOBIYA on 5 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43332 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1307 of 2024 Alok Mandal S/o Shri Ram Chandra Mandal Aged About 51 Years R/o Village P.V. -27, Post And Tahsil Pakhanjur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus Smt. Priyanka Mohobiya Director,
CGHC010376282024
2026:CGHC:43332
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 1307 of 2024
Alok Mandal S/o Shri Ram Chandra Mandal Aged About 51 Years R/o Village P.V. -27, Post And Tahsil Pakhanjur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
Smt. Priyanka Mohobiya Director, Panchyat And Rural Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan New Vikash Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur , Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent
For Petitioner
: Mr. Ashok Patil, Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 06.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for respondent submits that he has filed an order dated 09.04.2025 along with covering memo by which representation submitted by petitioner therein has been decided and subsequently rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of the said order has been handed over to him today.
3. In view of facts and circumstances of the case and submission of counsel for the parties, I do not find any good ground to continue with this contempt petition, accordingly the proceedings initiated against the respondents is hereby dropped.
4. Notice issued to respondents is discharged.
5. Contempt proceedings closed. However, petitioner will be at liberty to take recourse of the law, if he is aggrieved by the decision taken by respondents (herein). Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza