Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4568/2022 of AKHILESH SONI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 5 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43258 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4568 of 2022 1 - Akhilesh Soni S/o Ramlakhan Aged About 49 Years Elected Member Of Prathmik Laghu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Lakhanpur, Registration No. 1710, R/o Village Korja, District - Surguja, Headquarter
CGHC010348972022
2026:CGHC:43258
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4568 of 2022
1 - Akhilesh Soni S/o Ramlakhan Aged About 49 Years Elected Member Of Prathmik Laghu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Lakhanpur, Registration No. 1710, R/o Village Korja, District - Surguja, Headquarter Ambikapur (C.G.)
2 - Banarasi Ram S/o Govind Ram Aged About 61 Years Elected Member Of Prathmik Laghu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Raghunathpur, Registration No.
1696, R/o Village Uchdih, District Surguja, Headquarter Ambikapur (C.G.)
... Petitioners
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Co-Operativ Affairs, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Co-Operative Election Commission Through Its Commissioner, Raipur Mahila Thana Chowk, Chhotapara, District - Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies Surguja, Division Surguja, District :
Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
4 - Assistant Registrar / Registration Officer Zila Vanopaj Sahkari Sangh Maryadit, Surguja Registration No. 1610, Surguja, Headquarter Ambikapur, District Surguja
(C.G.)
5 - Managing Director/ Appellate Authority Zila Vanopaj Sahkari Sangh Maryadit, Surguja, Headquarter Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.)
... Respondents
For Petitioners
:
Shri Thadesh Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Manish Upadhyay, Advocate.
For Respondents No.1 &
3/State
:
Shri Vivek Siddharth, Panel Lawyer.
For Respondent No.2
:
Ms. Samidha Karamkelkar, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate.
S.B. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the grievance raised in the present petition has already been redressed and, accordingly, the petition has been rendered infructuous. He, therefore, prays that the present petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous.
2. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Kamde