Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3616/2021 of AMIT GUPTA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 5 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43245 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3616 of 2021 1 - Amit Gupta S/o Murari Prasad Gupta Aged About 29 Years Assistant Salesmen Of Govt, Faire Price Shop Dhelsara, P.S. And Tahsil - Sitapur, Distt.- Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010224812021
2026:CGHC:43245
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3616 of 2021
1 - Amit Gupta S/o Murari Prasad Gupta Aged About 29 Years Assistant Salesmen Of Govt, Faire Price Shop Dhelsara, P.S. And Tahsil - Sitapur, Distt.- Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supply Mahanadi Bhawan, New-Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2 - The Collector (Food Department) Surguja, Distt.- Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sitapur, Distt.- Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
4 - The Food Inspector Sitapur, Distt.- Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
5 - Nayab Tahsildar Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
6 - President Of Khadaiya Suraksha Poshan And Upbhokta Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Dhelsara P.S. And Tahsil - Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
None
For State
:
Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, GA
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
06/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. When the matter was called, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 08.09.2020 and 10.03.2021, whereby the fair price shop allotted to the petitioner was cancelled and pursuant to the said cancellation, the fair price shop was subsequently allotted to Upbhokta Seva Sarkari Samiti Maryadit, Dhelsara.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that, by efflux of time, the impugned orders have attained finality, as no interim order or stay was granted in favour of the petitioner, no effective relief can now be granted to the petitioner. Consequently, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Priyanka