Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2543/2026 of BHAGWAT THAWAIT Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 5 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43334 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2543 of 2026 1 - Bhagwat Thawait Son Of Santosh Thawait Aged About 27 Years Resident Of Katgi, Police Station -Kasdol, District - Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through
CGHC010382082026
2026:CGHC:43334
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2543 of 2026
1 - Bhagwat Thawait Son Of Santosh Thawait Aged About 27 Years Resident Of Katgi, Police Station -Kasdol, District - Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.)
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector And District Magistrate, District - Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.)
2 - The Superintendent Of Police, District -Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.)
3 - Station House Officer, Police Station -Kasdol, District -Balodabazar -Bhatapara
(C.G.)
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Pawan Kumar Kashyap, Advocate
For Respondents
:
Mr. Avinash Singh, Government Advocate
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 against the impugned order dated 21.09.2026 passed by the learned District Magistrate, District – Balodabazar - Bhatapara, in Criminal Case No. 202609210100020 Section 3, 5 B/2026.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State raises an objection with regard to maintainability of the petition on the ground that the petitioner is having an alternate efficacious remedy under Chhattisgarh Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition at this stage with liberty to take recourse of the other alternate remedy available under the law.
4. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail alternate remedy available under the law.
5. Office is directed to return back the certified copy of the documents enclosed along with the Cr.M.P. after retaining photocopies of the same. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY