Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/9145/2026 of N. RAMESH @ YOGANANDAN YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 4 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43054 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9145 of 2026 N. Ramesh @ Yoganandan Yadav S/o Lt. C.S. Natrajan Aged About 62 Years R/o House No. L.I. 211, Deendayal Colony Junwani, P.S. Supela District Durg Chhattisgarh At Present Address Swapnil Builders Kurud
CGHC010348672026
2026:CGHC:43054
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 9145 of 2026
N. Ramesh @ Yoganandan Yadav S/o Lt. C.S. Natrajan Aged About 62 Years R/o House No. L.I. 211, Deendayal Colony Junwani, P.S. Supela District Durg Chhattisgarh At Present Address Swapnil Builders Kurud Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh
--- Applicant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Supela Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent
(Cause title is taken from CIS system)
For Applicant
: Mr. C.K. Sahu, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Ram Narayan Sahu, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board
05/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Applicant has filed this first bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 870 of 2023, registered at Police Station – Supela Bhilai, District – Durg (C.G.) for offence punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 201 of I.P.C.. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN
2. Learned State counsel submits that applicant has not disclosed all the criminal antecedents of applicant in the bail application.
3. At this learned counsel for applicant submits that, he may be permitted to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file better constituted bail application.
4. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for applicant, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Balram