Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/820/2023 of EVANJEELIN THAKUR Vs CHHATTISGARH STATE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY on 4 October 2026
2026:CGHC:42965 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 820 of 2023 Evanjeelin Thakur W/o Late Shri Suresh Thakur (Ex. M.L.A.), Aged About 70 Years R/o H. No. 91, Ward No. 3, Dr. Amedkar, Village Ambagarh Chowki, Tehsil Chowkin, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ...
CGHC010049122023
2026:CGHC:42965
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 820 of 2023
Evanjeelin Thakur W/o Late Shri Suresh Thakur (Ex. M.L.A.), Aged About 70
Years R/o H. No. 91, Ward No. 3, Dr. Amedkar, Village Ambagarh Chowki, Tehsil Chowkin, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
versus
1.
Chhattisgarh State Legislative Assembly Through Its Secretary, Zero Point, Baloda Bazar Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2.
Madhya Pradesh State Legislative Assembly Through Its Secretary, 6CR7+498, Vidhan Bhavan, Bhim Nagar Slums, Arera Hills, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462004
3.
State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4.
State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
5.
Secretary, Department of GAD State of Madhya Pradesh, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, M.P.
6.
State of Madhya Pradesh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, M.P.
... Respondents
For Petitioner
: Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Advocate.
For Respondent /State
: Mr. Vivek Verma, Government Advocate.
For Respondent No. 2
: Ms. Laxmi Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Mr.
Adil Minhaj, Advocate.
[
Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
05.10.2026
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant family pension to the petitioner as per the rules/regulations from the date of actual entitlement of the petitioner along with all consequential benefits including arrears and other benefits along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
ii. Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner.
iii. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the present petition and, in this regard, has filed I.A. No. 01 of 2026 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, I.A. No. 01 of 2026 is allowed. Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Abhishek