Chhattisgarh High Court
FA/183/2024 of TIKAM SINHA Vs RAMESH KUMAR SINHA on 4 October 2026
2026:CGHC:42969-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 183 of 2024 1 - Tikam Sinha S/o Shri Fattu Sinha Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Thankhamharia, Tahsil Thankhamharia, District- Bemetara, C.G. ... Appellant Versus 1 - Ramesh Kumar Sinha S/o Budhram Sinha Aged About 39
CGHC010325202024
2026:CGHC:42969-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA No. 183 of 2024
1 - Tikam Sinha S/o Shri Fattu Sinha Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Thankhamharia, Tahsil Thankhamharia, District- Bemetara, C.G.
... Appellant
Versus
1 - Ramesh Kumar Sinha S/o Budhram Sinha Aged About 39 Years R/o Village And Tahsil Thankhamharia, District Bemetara, C.G.
2 - Fattu S/o Dongraha Sinha Aged About 87 Years R/o Village And Tahsil Thankhamharia, District Bemetara, C.G.
3 - Budhram S/o Fattu Sinha Aged About 60 Years R/o Village And Tahsil Thankhamharia, District Bemetara, C.G.
4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bemetara, District - Bemetara, C.G.
... Respondents
For Appellant
:
Mr. J.K. Gupta, Advocate
For Respondents No.
1 & 2
:
Mr. Anshit Singh Hora, Advocate on behalf of Mr.
Ravindra Sharma, Advocate
For Respondent No. 3 :
None though served
For Respondent No.
4/State
:
Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer
DB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Hon’ble Smt. Sushma Sawant, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the order dated 21.08.2024 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Bemetara, District – Bemetara in Civil Suit No. 09-A/2022.
2. Heard on I.A. No. 04/2026 which is an application for withdrawal of the appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during pendency of this appeal, settlement has been arrived between the parties and it is recorded in settlement deed executed by the parties on 14.07.2026, copy of which is filed along with the application for withdrawal of this appeal.
4. Learned counsel for the Respondents No. 1 & 2 do not dispute the submission of the counsel for the appellant.
5. On due consideration of the submission made by the counsel for parties and the reasons assigned in the application, I.A. No. 04/2026 is allowed. This First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY