Chhattisgarh High Court
REVP/332/2026 of GOVERDHAN MOURYA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 4 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43037-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 332 of 2026 Goverdhan Mourya S/o Kailash Chandra Mourya Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Waspani Godiyapal Police Station Bhanpuri District Bastar (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The
CGHC010361312026
2026:CGHC:43037-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
REVP No. 332 of 2026
Goverdhan Mourya S/o Kailash Chandra Mourya Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Waspani Godiyapal Police Station Bhanpuri District Bastar (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1.
State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Home Police Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar New, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2.
The Inspector General of Police Bastar Range Lalbag - Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh.
3.
The Superintendent of Police Bastar Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh
4.
The Sub Divisional Officer Police Keshlur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh.
...Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate.
For Respondents/State
:
Mr. Anand Dadariya, Deputy Advocate
General.
Hon'ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra
, Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
Per
Krushna Ram Mohapatra
, Chief Justice
.10.2026
1. Heard Mr. Sushil Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Anand Dadariya, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondents.
2. The petitioner in this review petition seeks review of order dated 13.08.2026 passed by the co-ordinate Bench in WA No. 693 of 2026 only to the extent of imposing a cost of Rs. 50,000/- on the review petitioner while dismissing the appeal.
3. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the review petitioner prays for withdrawal of the review petition.
4. Mr. Anand Dadariya, learned Deputy Advocate General, does not have any objection to the said prayer.
5. Hence, the review petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra)
Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan