Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/921/2026 of ARJUN CHOUHAN Vs UNION OF INDIA on 4 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43084 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 921 of 2026 1 - Arjun Chouhan S/o Lursay Aged About 32 Years Presently R/o Village Gajra/ Katainar Basti, Post And Police Station Bankimongra, District Korba, Chhattisgarh (Presently Aged About 39 Years) ... Applicant(s)
CGHC010385252026
2026:CGHC:43084
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 921 of 2026
1 - Arjun Chouhan S/o Lursay Aged About 32 Years Presently R/o Village Gajra/ Katainar Basti, Post And Police Station Bankimongra, District Korba, Chhattisgarh (Presently Aged About 39 Years)
... Applicant(s)
versus
1 - Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi 2 - Inspector General Head Quarter, S B - F T R - B S F, 2-B Lord Sinha Road, Kolkata 71
3 - Commandant 39 B N B S F, Roshanbag, Murshidabad, West Bengal
... Respondent(s)
For Applicant(s)
:
Mr. Amitesh Yadav, Advocate
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. RCS. Dev Singh, Advocate
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.)
Order on Board
05/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. Present is an application for restoration of the W.P.(S) No.6996 of 2019, which has been dismissed for want of prosecution on 03.08.2026.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that due to unavoidable reason he could not appeared when the matter was called for hearing and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. The matter pertains to reinstatement of the petitioner and rejection of his representation by the authorities concerned and matter requires VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA
for hearing on merits, therefore, the writ petition may be restored in its original number for hearing on merits.
5. On the other hand learned counsel appearing for the respondents opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant.
6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
7. The W.P.(S) No.6996 of 2019 is restored to its original number.
8. The MCC is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Vaishali