Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5027/2026 of RUPENDRA CHANDRAKAR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 30 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42714 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5027 of 2026 Rupendra Chandrakar S/o Shri Chhannulal Chandrakar Aged About 50 Years R/o Champaran, Chowk Gobra Nawapara, Tahsil Gobra Nawapara, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh
CGHC010371962026
2026:CGHC:42714
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5027 of 2026
Rupendra Chandrakar S/o Shri Chhannulal Chandrakar Aged About 50
Years R/o Champaran, Chowk Gobra Nawapara, Tahsil Gobra Nawapara, Distt- Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.)
-
The
Collector,
Distt-
Raipur
(C.G.)
3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Cum Land Acquisition Officer, Abhanpur, Distt- Raipur
(C.G.)
4 - The Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction), South East Central Railway, Raipur, Distt- Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly call for the entire record in relation to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ or order, to direct the respondent authorities concerned to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, within stipulated period and grant him compensation properly, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief, this Hon’ble Court, may deem fit and proper, in the interest of justice.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation before the concerned respondent authorities claiming compensation in respect of his case, which is pending consideration. He, therefore, prays that a suitable direction may be issued to the competent authority to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated period and to grant compensation to the petitioner in accordance with law.
3. Learned State Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law, within such time as may be fixed by this Court.
4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Madhurima