Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/919/2026 of SMT. JYOTI JAIN Vs AMIT JAIN on 30 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42696 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 919 of 2026 1 - Smt. Jyoti Jain W/o Amit Jain Aged About 35 Years R/o Bajrang Chowk Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Aarav Jain S/o Amit Jain Aged About 5 Years Minor Represented Through Natural Guardian
CGHC010360592026
2026:CGHC:42696
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 919 of 2026
1 - Smt. Jyoti Jain W/o Amit Jain Aged About 35 Years R/o Bajrang Chowk Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Aarav Jain S/o Amit Jain Aged About 5 Years Minor Represented Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Jyoti Jain W/o Amit Jain, R/o Bajrang Chowk Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh,
... Applicants
versus
1 - Amit Jain S/o Shri Prakashchand Jain Aged About 37 Years R/o Bajrang Chowk Kawardha, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh,.
2 - Anish Arora S/o Shri Anil Arora R/o M-16, Padmanabhpur, Ward No. 46
Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Divisional Manager, New India Insurance Company Limited, Ambikapur, Ambika Transport, Amiba Petrol Pump Campus, Ambedkar Chouk, Banaras Raod, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Applicants
:
Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate
For Respondents
:
None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay
Kumar Jaiswal
Order on Board
(01/10/2026)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on admission.
2. This M.C.C. has been filed for restoration of MAC No.741/2021, which was dismissed in default by this Court vide order dated 19/08/2026.
3. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same.
4. Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and the said appeal i.e. MAC No.741/2021 is restored to its original number. No order as to costs.
Sd/-
(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)
Judge Prashant