Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/866/2026 of THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(CENTRAL)-2 Vs M/S NR TMT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. on 30 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42765-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 866 of 2026 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Central)-2 Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus M/s NR TMT (India) Pvt. Ltd. Flat No. 106, Goverdhan Tower Chaitanya Nagar, Raigarh P A N - A A E C P- 8302 R ----
CGHC010347412026
2026:CGHC:42765-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 866 of 2026
The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Central)-2 Raipur (C.G.)
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
M/s NR TMT (India) Pvt. Ltd. Flat No. 106, Goverdhan Tower Chaitanya Nagar, Raigarh P A N - A A E C P- 8302 R
---- Respondent
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Applicant
: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate
For Respondent
: Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Advocate
Division Bench
Hon'ble Shri
Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Hon'ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Judge
Order On Board
(01.10.2026)
Per
Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on I.A. No.1, which is an application for condonation of delay in filing MCC.
2. The application is opposed by learned counsel for respondent.
3. On consideration of the submission of learned counsel for respective parties as also the reasons assigned in the application for condonation of delay, I.A. No.1 is allowed and the delay of 85 days in filing the MCC is condoned. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN
4. Also heard on application for restoration of TAXC No. 174 of 2025, which was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 15.04.2026, which is opposed by learned counsel for respondent.
5. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for applicant as also the pleadings made in the application, application for restoration is allowed and TAXC No. 174 of 2025 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu)
(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
Judge Balram