Chhattisgarh High Court
MA/39/2024 of SAMEER KUMAR Vs SHASHIL (SUSHIL KUMAR) on 30 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42856 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 39 of 2024 Sameer Kumar S/o Late Chimman Lal Aged About 63 Years R/o State Bank of India Gali, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Dist. Bilaspur, (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1. Shashil (Sushil Kumar) S/o Late Chimman
CGHC010126042024
2026:CGHC:42856
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MA No. 39 of 2024
Sameer Kumar S/o Late Chimman Lal Aged About 63 Years R/o State Bank of India Gali, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Dist. Bilaspur, (C.G.)
... Appellant
versus
1.
Shashil (Sushil Kumar) S/o Late Chimman Lal Aged About 65 Years R/o Indira Colony, Near Tarbahar Naka, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Dist. Bilaspur,
C.G.
2.
State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, (C.G.)
... Respondents
For Appellant
: Mr. Sudeep Verma, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 2/State
: Mr. Anand Gupta, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput
, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
01.10.2026
1. Heard Mr. Sudeep Verma, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Anand Gupta, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for respondent No. 2/State.
2. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 02.03.2024 passed by the Fourth Additional District Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 22A/2024, titled as Sameer Kumar Versus Shashil Kumar (Sushil Kumar) & Another, whereby the learned Court has dismissed the application preferred by the present appellant/plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking interim injunction.
3. Mr. Verma, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant appeal.
4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, the permission, as prayed for, is granted.
5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. The interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated. Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Abhishek