Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4992/2026 of BANK OF INDIA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 29 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42493 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4992 of 2026 1 - Bank Of India Through Authorised Officer, Ramarao Bongani, S/o Shri Satyanarayana Aged About 48 Years, Bank Of India, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010384302026
2026:CGHC:42493
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4992 of 2026
1 - Bank Of India Through Authorised Officer, Ramarao Bongani, S/o Shri Satyanarayana Aged About 48 Years, Bank Of India, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Raipur, District Raipur , Chhattisgarh.
2 - District Magistrate -Cum - Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
3 - M/s R.B. Agro And Suppliers, Through Proprietor Ishwari Das Mundra, D/o Vallabh Das Mundra, R/o B-101, Usha Heritage, Vaishali Nagar, Phase 2, Shrikant Verma Marg, Behind Mosaji Sweets, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Krishna Choudhary, W/o Tulsi Das Choudhary, R/o House No.36, Ghuru Road, Ameri, Post Mangla, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Digitally
signed by
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Amit Nayak, Panel Lawyer.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1. That, the records pertaining to the revenue case of the petitioner, may be kindly called for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authority to decide the Revenue Case No. 202604072100005/B-121/2025-2026 as per section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act of 2002, in the interest of justice.
10.3. That any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has confined the prayer in the present petition to a limited direction that the pending application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, filed before the District Magistrate, Bilaspur, may kindly be considered and decided within a time-bound period in accordance with law.
3. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the limited prayer made in the present petition, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's pending application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the pending application, and the competent authority shall decide the same strictly in accordance with law and on its own merits.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat