Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3840/2026 of Kaushil Higher Seccondary School Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 29 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42644 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3840 of 2026 1 - Kaushil Higher Seccondary School Through Its Principal Arun Kaushil S/o Shri Nand Ram Kaushil Aged About 55, Years R/o Kaushil Higher Secondary School Tulsi, Nagar Korba, District Korba C.G. 2 - Gaurav
CGHC010272102026
2026:CGHC:42644
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3840 of 2026
1 - Kaushil Higher Seccondary School Through Its Principal Arun Kaushil S/o Shri Nand Ram Kaushil Aged About 55, Years R/o Kaushil Higher Secondary School Tulsi, Nagar Korba, District Korba
C.G.
2 - Gaurav Yuva Mandal Tulsi Nagar Korba Through Its Secretary Arun Kaushil S/o Shri Nand Ram Kaushil Aged About 55 Years, Working As Principal Kaushil Higher Secondary School Tulsi Nagar Transport Nagar Korba District Korba C.G.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education Manahandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar District Raipur C.G.
492002.
District Education Officer, Korba District Korba C.G.
-
Joint
Director
Education
Division
Bilaspur
C.G.
4 - Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education Through Its Secretary, Pension Bada, Raipur District Raipur C.G.
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI
YADAV
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Vivek Verma, Government Advocate
For Respondent No. 4
: Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition afresh, as, in the meantime, certain orders have been passed against the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and there being no objection on behalf of the respondents, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition afresh.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi