Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/1178/2025 of M/S. FABWORTH INDIA LIMITED Vs CHHATTISGARH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1178 of 2025 1 - M/s. Fabworth India Limited (Uniworth Textiles Limited), S/o A Company Registered Under Indian Companies Act, 1956 Having Its Head Office At 923-945, Urla Growth Centre, Industrial Estate, Sector D, Sarona, Urla, Raipur
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CGHC010453042025
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1178 of 2025 1 - M/s. Fabworth India Limited (Uniworth Textiles Limited), S/o A Company Registered Under Indian Companies Act, 1956 Having Its Head Office At 923-945, Urla Growth Centre, Industrial Estate, Sector D, Sarona, Urla, Raipur District Raipur Represented Through Its Authorized Signatory Shri Harish Kant Mandre
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited A State Underatking Through Its Managing Director, 1st Floor Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, In Front Of Sonakhan Bhawan, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Executive Director Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, 1st Floor Udyog Corporation Limited, 1st Floor Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, In Front Sonakhan Bhawan, Telibandha, Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The General Manager Land Allotment Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, 1st Floor Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, In Front Sonakhan Bhawan, Telibandha, Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) Order Sheet 30/09/2026 Shri Amitesh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ayaz Naved, Advocate for the respondents. Heard. The present MCC has been filed seeking restoration of WPC No.3242 of 2016 which got dismissed for want of prosecution on 21.11.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to unavoidable reason he could not appear before the court when the matter was called on for hearing and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. He would further submit that the issue involved in the writ petition is cancellation of lease which requires adjudication on merits, and therefore, the said writ petition i.e. WPC No.3242 of 2016 may be restored to its original number and it be decided on merits. On the other hand, the counsel for the respondents opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and also finding the reasons assigned to be genuine, the present MCC stands allowed and WPC No.3242 of 2016 is directed to be restored to its original number. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Inder