Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5004/2026 of KESHAV SONKAR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 29 September 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5004 of 2026 Keshav Sonkar Son Of Kangalu Sonkar Aged About 71 Years Resident Of Navapara, Police Station Gobara-Navapara, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary,
CGHC010378862026
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5004 of 2026
Keshav Sonkar Son Of Kangalu Sonkar Aged About 71 Years Resident Of Navapara, Police Station Gobara-Navapara, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Collector Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Sub Divisional Officer Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.)
4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Gobara-Nawapara, District Raipur (C.G.)
5 - Goverdhan Tarak Resident Of Kurra, Police Station Gobara-Navapara, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate, Mr.
Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate
For Respective Respondents : Mr. Praveen Das, Additional A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30.09
.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, submits that there are certain defects in the description of the parties and in the documents filed with the petition. He, therefore, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file a duly constituted fresh petition.
2. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is fair and reasonable and, accordingly, is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Saurabh