Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2554/2026 of BABULAL AGRAWAL Vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION on 29 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42482 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2554 of 2026 1 - Babulal Agrawal S/o Sh. R.K. Agrawal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Samarth, New Timber Market, Fafadi, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Central Bureau Of Investigation V.I.P.
CGHC010369192026
2026:CGHC:42482
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2554 of 2026
1 - Babulal Agrawal S/o Sh. R.K. Agrawal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Samarth, New Timber Market, Fafadi, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.).
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Central Bureau Of Investigation V.I.P. Road, Near Mana P.T.S.
Road, Raipur, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.).
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate.
For Respondent
:
Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay
Kumar Jaiswal
Order on Board
(30.09.2026)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on admission.
2. Admit.
3. The present CRMP has been filed seeking for restoration of CRR No. 374/2024 which got dismissed on account of peremptory order passed by this Court on 18.02.2026.
4. Vide order dated 18.02.2026 passed by this Court, three weeks' time was granted to learned counsel for the applicant to rectify the default(s), subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/-, failing which the revision petition would stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the wife of the applicant was seriously ill and was undergoing continuous medical treatment. Consequently, the applicant could not pursue the matter further, resulting in dismissal of the revision petition for non-compliance with the aforesaid order. He further submits that the non-compliance with the order of this Court was neither deliberate nor intentional, but was occasioned by bona fide reasons beyond the control of the petitioner.
6. Having regard to the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and the cause shown in the application, this Court is of the considered view that sufficient cause has been shown for restoration of CRR No. 374/2024. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to restore the said revision petition.
7. The prayer for restoration of the revision petition is, accordingly, allowed and CRR No. 374/2024 is restored to its original number. The applicant is directed to deposit the costs of Rs.2,000/- with the High Court Legal Services Authority, as directed by this Court vide order dated 18.02.2026, within a period of two weeks from today.
8. Accordingly, the CRMP stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)
Judge $ourabh