Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4931/2026 of PRAVEEN KUMAR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 28 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42292 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4931 of 2026 1 - Praveen Kumar S/o Jagdish Singh Aged About 41 Years Caste - Jaat, R/o Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Presently R/o Village- Dhadhutola, Tehsil- Ambagarh Chowki, District- Mohla-Manpur- Ambagarh
CGHC010366302026
2026:CGHC:42292
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4931 of 2026
1 - Praveen Kumar S/o Jagdish Singh Aged About 41 Years Caste - Jaat, R/o Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Presently R/o Village- Dhadhutola, Tehsil- Ambagarh Chowki, District- Mohla-Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya Mahandi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Collector Ambagarh, District- Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Tahsildar Ambagarh Chowki, District- Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh.
4 - Asha Devi Gayakwad D/o Late Amardas Gayakwad R/o Village- Kotra, Tehsil- Ambagarh Chowki, District- Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the pending revision of the petitioner dated 22.06.2026 filed under Section 50 of C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 within stipulated time. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the respondent no. 4 while deciding revision of the petitioner. 10.3 Any other relief, which may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a revision dated 22.06.2026 under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, before respondent No. 2, which is pending consideration. He submits that despite the revision having been filed, the same has not yet been decided. He, therefore, prays that a suitable direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the pending revision dated 22.06.2026 within a stipulated period, in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent No. 4.
3. Learned State Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the pending revision of the petitioner may be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. He further submits that the petitioner as well as respondent No. 4
shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing before passing an appropriate order on the revision.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and the relief sought by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the revision dated 22.06.2026 filed by the petitioner under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to the parties, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed off. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Madhurima