Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3583/2021 of KUSH KUMAR SURYAWANSHI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 28 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42332 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3583 of 2021 Kush Kumar Suryawanshi S/o Manrakhan Aged About 37 Years R/o Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The
CGHC010227112021
2026:CGHC:42332
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3583 of 2021
Kush Kumar Suryawanshi S/o Manrakhan Aged About 37 Years R/o Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur
(C.G.), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2 - The Collector District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - The District Education Officer District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Van Devi Rathore W/o Late Manishankar Rathore Aged About 47
Years R/o Ward No. 11, Purani Basti, Janjgir, P.S. And Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
---Respondents
(Cause title taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Akash Deep Sharma, Advocate on
behalf of Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani,
Advocate
For Respondents/State
: Ms. Akanksha Verma, PL
For Respondent No.4
: Ms. Vaishali Jeswani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate Digitally signed by AMIT
PATEL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant writ petition.
2. The prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL