Chhattisgarh High Court
MAC/2288/2024 of SOUMYA AGRAWAL Vs SMT. ANJALI SONWANI on 28 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42352 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 2288 of 2024 1 - Soumya Agrawal S/o Punit Agrawal Aged About 17 Years (Now Aged About 18 Years) R/o Near Nehru Nagar Park, Surajpur, P.S., Tahsil And District- Surajpur, C.G. 2 - Punit Agrawal S/o Satyanarayan Agrawal
CGHC010403982024
2026:CGHC:42352
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MAC No. 2288 of 2024
1 - Soumya Agrawal S/o Punit Agrawal Aged About 17 Years (Now Aged About 18 Years) R/o Near Nehru Nagar Park, Surajpur, P.S., Tahsil And District- Surajpur, C.G.
2 - Punit Agrawal S/o Satyanarayan Agrawal Aged About 45 Years (Now Aged About 46 Years) Occupation - Business, R/o Near Nehru Nagar Park, Surajpur, P.S., Tahsil And District- Surajpur, C.G. (Non-Applicant)
... Appellants
versus
1 - Smt. Anjali Sonwani W/o Tekram Sonwani Aged About 37 Years R/o Tivargudi, Police Station And Tahsil- Ramanujnagar, District- Surajpur,
C.G. (Claimant)
2 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Through The Divisional Office, Ambedkar Chowk, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, C.G. (Non- Applicant)
... Respondents
For Appellants
:
None
For Respondents
:
None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board
/ 09
/ 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On 05.12.2024, when the matter was called for hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants. Today also when the matter is called for hearing, no one appears on behalf of the appellants.
2. It transpires from the record and the prayer made in the appeal that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge pekde