Armed Forces Tribunal

Ex Sep Babu Singh (Army) vs UOI & Others on 28 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

**ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR**

**1.**

**OA No 155/2015 with MA No 241/2015**

**Army No 6484809P Ex Sep/ASH Babu Singh**

Versus

**UOI & Others**

.... Applicant

.... Respondents

For Applicant : None

For Respondents : Mr Shree Narayan Swami, Advocate

**CORAM:**

**HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)**

**HON'BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)**

![Emblem of the Armed Forces Tribunal, featuring a central figure holding a sword and scales, surrounded by a circular border with text in Hindi and English.](f29609e68b729e4cfa0f4056996292bb_9_img.webp)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

**ORDER**

**28.04.2026**

1. 1. None present for the Applicant.

2. 2. It is apparent from record that with the passing away of designated Counsel for the Applicant, it was deemed appropriate to issue Notice to the applicant in this matter for his personal appearance or through a designated counsel for pursuing the matter, if so desired. Despite Notice dated 09/12/2025 having been received by the applicant on 04/1/2026 as has been endorsed by the applicant on the receipted copy of the Notice, none appears on behalf of the applicant. Moreover, a fresh Notice dated 09/1/2026 was also issued to the applicant for his personal appearance or through a designated Counsel on 28/4/2026, ie, today. However, neither the applicant nor any designated counsel on his behalf appears before the Bench.

3. 3. In view of the foregoing and since adequate opportunity has been afforded to the applicant to pursue his matter either personally or through a designated counsel, by way of issuing Notices to him, non appearance in this matter either by the applicant or through a designated counsel clearly shows that applicant is not desirous of pursuing this Application.

- 4. The OA is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.

- 5. File be consigned to record.

![State Emblem of India (Lion Capital of Ashoka)](27a3cf8763b0eef119f7f314b994db13_4_img.webp)

सत्यमेव जयते

Sd/-XXX

Sd/-XXX

(SANJIV MITTAL) MEMBER (A)

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (J)

cda/-

![Seal of the Armed Forces Tribunal featuring scales of justice, an eagle, and an anchor, surrounded by the text 'भारत बल आदि' and 'ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL'](27a3cf8763b0eef119f7f314b994db13_11_img.webp)![Banner with the motto 'यतो न्यायः ततो जयः' (Yato Nyaay: Tato Jay: - Where there is justice, there is victory)](27a3cf8763b0eef119f7f314b994db13_12_img.webp)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead