Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/1245/2026 of TEPA HARIJAN @ FADARSHAN Vs KULVANT SINGH RAINA on 28 September 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1245 of 2026 1 - Tepa Harijan @ Fadarshan S/o Lahri Harijan Aged About 65 Years R/o Nadipar, Many Mohalla, Ward No. 21, Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt. M.C.B., Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Kaushilya Bai W/o Tepa Harijan Aged About
CGHC010363732026
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 1245 of 2026
1 - Tepa Harijan @ Fadarshan S/o Lahri Harijan Aged About 65 Years R/o Nadipar, Many Mohalla, Ward No. 21, Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt. M.C.B., Chhattisgarh.
2 - Smt. Kaushilya Bai W/o Tepa Harijan Aged About 61 Years R/o Nadipar, Many Mohalla, Ward No. 21, Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt.
M.C.B., Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Kulvant Singh Raina S/o Late Sardar Gurucharan Singh R/o Ward No. 12, Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt. M.C.B., C.G., Through Power Of Attorney Tejvant Singh Raina, S/o Kulvant Singh Raina, R/o Ward No. 12, Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt. M.C.B., Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ramsevak Soni, Advocate through virtual mode and Mr. Ravi Kumar Banjare, Advocate For Respondent(s) :
Mr. A.N. Bakta, Advocate along with Vivek Bhakta, Advocate on caveat Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Order on Board
29.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh duly constituted petition.
2. Not opposes by respondent counsel who appeared as caveator.
3. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
4. Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the annexures to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining its attested true copy. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika