Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3502/2021 of TRIGUN KUMAR SADANI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 28 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42331 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3502 of 2021 1 - Trigun Kumar Sadani S/o Shankar Lal Sadani Aged About 47 Years R/o House No. 28, Ward No. 28, Mahavir Chowk, Kanharpuri, District - Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 -
CGHC010162902021
2026:CGHC:42331
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3502 of 2021
1 - Trigun Kumar Sadani S/o Shankar Lal Sadani Aged About 47 Years R/o House No. 28, Ward No. 28, Mahavir Chowk, Kanharpuri, District - Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Tilak Ram Sahu S/o Narottam Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o 481, Ward No. 32, Rajiv Nagar, Lakhdi, District - Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)
3 - Deepak Kumar Sahu S/o Late Ganga Ram Sahu Aged About 39
Years R/o Lakholi, Ward No. 35, District - Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)
4 - Anil Sahu S/o Madho Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Lakholi, Ward No. 35, District- Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Public Education Directorate Of Public Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Third Floor, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3 - Collector Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)
4 - District Education Officer Education Department Rajnandgaon, District (Chhattisgarh), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS System)
For Petitioners
: Mr. Amitesh Yadav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Yogeshwar Sharma, Advocate Digitally signed by AMIT
PATEL
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, PL
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 29.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, the relief claimed by the petitioners has become infructuous.
2. In view of above, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE AMIT PATEL