Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4248/2022 of SMT ALKA GUPTA Vs TAXATION OFFICER/ REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER on 27 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42191 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4248 of 2022 Smt Alka Gupta W/o Shri G. P. Gupta Aged About 30 Years Occupation- Bus Operator, R/o Jain Mandir Pratap Ganj Para, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar Chhattisgarh. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Ganesh Prasad
CGHC010297532022
2026:CGHC:42191
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4248 of 2022
Smt Alka Gupta W/o Shri G. P. Gupta Aged About 30 Years Occupation- Bus Operator, R/o Jain Mandir Pratap Ganj Para, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar Chhattisgarh. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Ganesh Prasad Gupta, S/o Shri Shankar Lal Gupta, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Chandali Police Stataion- Katpad, District- Koraput (Orisa) At Present Addres Pratap Ganj Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
versus
Taxation Officer/ Regional Transport Officer Jagdalpur District- Bastar Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Bajpai, Advocate
For Res./State
:
Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble
Mr.
Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
28/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to consider pending application dated 26.10.2018 (Anneuxre P-1) and provide documents sought in his application dated 26.10.2018 within stipulated time, in the interest of justice.
(ii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. No objection has been raised from other side.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Ami