Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/1114/2024 of BRANCH MANAGER Vs KU. PRINCI BHIMTE on 27 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42257 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1114 of 2024 1 - Branch Manager S B I General Insurance Company, Office- 2nd Floor, Shop Number 207-208, Rama Port, Main Road, Near Mahima Big Bazar, Bilaspur 495001 (Non Applicant No. 3) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 -
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CGHC010421092024
2026:CGHC:42257
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1114 of 2024 1 - Branch Manager S B I General Insurance Company, Office- 2nd Floor, Shop Number 207-208, Rama Port, Main Road, Near Mahima Big Bazar, Bilaspur 495001 (Non Applicant No. 3)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ku. Princi Bhimte D/o Vinod Kumar Bhimte Aged About 23 Years R/o Risham Nagar, Tehsil And District Raipur, C.G.(Claimant/plaintiff) 2 - Kamalram S/o Shri Aaduram Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Kopra, Shiv Chowk, Tehsil Rajim, District Gariyaband, C.G., Present Address- Village Amleshwar, Durga Nagar, District Durg, C.G. (Vehicle Number
C.G.-
08-Aq-7579
Registered
Vehicle
Driver) (Claimant/plaintiff) 3 - Dijendra S/o Dhansingh Yadav R/o Village Pandritarai, P.S. Ambagarh Chowki, District - Mohla-Manpur, C.G. (Vehicle Number C.G.- 08-Aq-7579 Registered Vehicle Owner) (Claimant/plaintiff) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.P.S.Gandhi, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate For Respondent No.2 & 3 : Ms. Anushka Singh, Advocate
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 28/09/2026 Learned counsel appearing for the parties have jointly submitted that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and the present petition may be disposed of in terms of the settlement with liberty to the parties to place the compromise deed before the trial court.
2. In view of the submissions made by the counsel for the respective parties and that the dispute between the parties have been amicably resolved, the petition stands disposed of.
3. Meanwhile, the parties shall be at liberty to place the compromise deed before the learned trial court. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge