Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/1267/2026 of A. CHIRANJEEVI Vs AMITA MASIH on 27 September 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1267 of 2026 A . Chiranjeevi S/o Shri Annadurai Aged About 42 Years Permanent Resident Of 5/157-1 A , Mariamman Kovil Street, Jagir Reddipatti, Jagir Ammapalayam Post, District Salem, Tamil Nadu - 636 302, Currently Residing At B.C.K.
CGHC010381202026
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 1267 of 2026
A. Chiranjeevi S/o Shri Annadurai Aged About 42 Years Permanent Resident Of 5/157-1 A, Mariamman Kovil Street, Jagir Reddipatti, Jagir Ammapalayam Post, District Salem, Tamil Nadu - 636 302, Currently Residing At B.C.K. 173, Hash Tag 06-409, Woodlands Street 13, Singapore - 730173.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
Amita Masih W/o Shri A. Chiranjeevi Aged About 38 Years Residing At Ward No. 21, Rajendra Ward, Mission Station Road, Tilda, Neora, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh - 493114.
... Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Nikhil Kumar Singh, Advocate.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board
28/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the proceedings initiated by the petitioner before the learned 4th Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, have been dismissed for want of prosecution on 22nd September, 2026, therefore, at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court again after restoration of the original proceedings before the learned 4th Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur.
He would also submit that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the learned Family Court, Raipur, through video conferencing, as he is presently residing in Singapore and it is not possible for him to physically appear before the learned Family Court for prosecuting his restoration application.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considered the submission.
3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Family Court for restoration of the original proceedings. If any application is made by the petitioner for prosecuting the restoration application through video conferencing, the same may be considered by the learned Family Court in accordance with law and on its own merits.
4. The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
5. The Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the annexure(s) to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining attested true copies of the same. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok