Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4596/2026 of MADANLAL SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 27 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42243 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4596 of 2026 1 - Madanlal Sahu S/o Makhanlal Sahu, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Thakurkapa Tahsil And P.S. Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary,
CGHC010340252026
2026:CGHC:42243
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4596 of 2026
1 - Madanlal Sahu S/o Makhanlal Sahu, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Thakurkapa Tahsil And P.S. Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Manatralaya Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur
(C.G.)
2 - Collector / Additional Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.)
3 - Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Takhatpur, District Bilaspur(C.G.)
Tahsildar, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
5 - Naib Tahsildar, Tahsil - Takhatpur District - Bilaspur (C.G.)
6 - Revenue Inspector, Circle Belpan, Tahsil - Takhatpur District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
7 - Patwari, P.H. No. 8, Village Belpan, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
8 - Pyari Bai, W/o Kishun Ram, Aged About 55 Years Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat, Thakurkapa, Tahsil And P.S. Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State :
Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 28/09/2026
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Digitally
signed by
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2, 4 & 5 to demarcate the disputed possession of government land respondent no.
8.
10.2) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Court to respondents No. 4 & 5, to decide the application dated 10.07.2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending representation, he is having no objection to the limited prayer. His pending representation will be considered in accordance with law.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the concerned respondents No. 4 & 5 consider/decide the application of the petitioner dated 10.07.2026 in accordance with law/rules/regulations and in an objective manner as expeditiously as possible within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat