Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2529/2026 of AKANKSHA SHRIVASTAVA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 27 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42227 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2529 of 2026 Akanksha Shrivastava D/o Deepak Shrivastav, Aged About 31 Years R/o House No. 1125/01, Jai Prakash Nagar, Adhartal, District Jabalpur, M.P. (Details Wrongly Mentioned In Annexure P/1 Without Age) ---
CGHC010379742026
2026:CGHC:42227
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2529 of 2026
Akanksha Shrivastava D/o Deepak Shrivastav, Aged About 31 Years R/o House No. 1125/01, Jai Prakash Nagar, Adhartal, District Jabalpur, M.P.
(Details Wrongly Mentioned In Annexure P/1 Without Age)
--- Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S H O P.S. City Kotwali, District Raipur
C.G.
2 - Sonal Sharma, W/o Chandrahas Sharma, Aged About 44 Years R/o G-12, P W D Colony, Byron Bazar District Raipur C.G. (Details As Mentioned In Statement U/s 164 Crpc @ Annexure P/2 Colly.)... (Complainant)
--- Respondent
(Cause title is taken from CIS system)
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Trivikram Nayak, Advocate
For State/Respondent No.1
:
Mr. Sumit Singh, Dy.A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board
28/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “(I) It may kindly be pleased to direct that the trial pending in Criminal Case No.22250 of 2023, before the learned Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN
C.G. (Learned Trial Court) be expedited and conclude within a stipulated time frame preferably within six months. (II) Any other relief, that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that based on the complaint made by respondent No.2 on 09.09.2023, FIR was registered against petitioner for offence U/s. 509-B of I.P.C. and Section 66-C of I.T. Act, 2000. After conclusion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed on 22.11.2023, before the Court Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur. Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur framed charges against petitioner on 20.08.2025. Thereafter, the matter was fixed for recording of evidence of prosecution witnesses. However, till date, no substantial progress has been made in the trial. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the trial has remained pending since long without any progress and, therefore, prays that the learned trial Court may be directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within specified time framed.
3. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, and particularly the fact that criminal case registered against petitioner is pending since 2023, this criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned learned trial Court to expedite the trial. The learned trial Court is also directed to take all necessary and appropriate steps for securing the presence of prosecution witnesses for their examination without undue delay. The learned Trial Court shall make all possible efforts to conclude the trial in Criminal Case No. 22250 of 2023 expeditiously, in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram