Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3372/2021 of DEEPTI BUILDERS PROPRIETOR SMT. PARVATI BANJARE Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 25 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41926 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3372 of 2021 Deepti Builders Proprietor Smt. Parvati Banjare W/o Shri Dhaniram Banjare, Aged About 34 Years R/o Ward No. 18, Deepti Vihar, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa,
CGHC010191742021
2026:CGHC:41926
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3372 of 2021
Deepti Builders Proprietor Smt. Parvati Banjare W/o Shri Dhaniram Banjare, Aged About 34 Years R/o Ward No. 18, Deepti Vihar, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
- Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District :
Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
4 - Assistant Director, Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner
: None
For Respondents/State
: Mr. Praveen Das, Additional A.G.
For Respondent No. 5
: Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Digitally signed by AMIT
PATEL
Order on Board
26.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None present for the petitioners, even when the matter is called twice, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the instant petition for want of prosecution.
SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL