Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/984/2023 of NAWADHABAI Vs AARTI on 25 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42025 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 984 of 2023 1 - Nawadhabai Daughter of Heeralal, Aged About 58 Years Caste - Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. (Revisionerist) 2 - Duleshwari @
CGHC010395512023
2026:CGHC:42025
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 984 of 2023
1 - Nawadhabai Daughter of Heeralal, Aged About 58 Years Caste -
Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District -
Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. (Revisionerist)
2 - Duleshwari @ Dileshwari, Daughter Of Heeralal, Aged About 65 Years Caste - Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Vidya Bai Daughter of Heeralal, Aged About 58 Years Caste - Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District - Sarangarh- Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.
4 - Padman Bai Daughter of Heeralal, Aged About 47 Years Caste -
Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.
5 - Santoshibai Daughter of Heeralal, Aged About 49 Years Caste -
Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District -
Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Aarti Daughter of Deendayal, Caste - Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Savrin Bai Wife of Deendayal, Caste - Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Mamta Daughter of Deendayal, Caste - Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.
4 - Anjali Daughter of Deendayal, Caste - Satnami, Resident of Village Jhumka, Tahsil Bhatgaon District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
None.
For Respondents
No. 1 to 4
:
Mr. Chandrabhushan Kesharwani, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 26/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.
2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Judge Vaishali