Chhattisgarh High Court

WPC/1160/2022 of M/S R.K. AGENCY Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:41928 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1160 of 2022 M/s R.K. Agency Through its Proprietor Suresh Guruwani, Aged About 59 Years, S/o Late Mohanlal Guruwani, Near Company Garden Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Lines, Tahsil and District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh,

CGHC010077292022

2026:CGHC:41928

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 1160 of 2022

M/s R.K. Agency Through its Proprietor Suresh Guruwani, Aged About 59 Years, S/o Late Mohanlal Guruwani, Near Company Garden Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Lines, Tahsil and District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Mo. No. 9425219069.

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Energy, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil

and

District

Raipur

Chhattisgarh.

2 - Engineer In Chief (Administration) Chhattisgarh State Renewable Energy Development Agency (CREDA), VIP (Airport) Road, Near Energy Education Park, P.O. Devpuri Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3 - Superintending Engineer CREDA, Zonal Office C /2, Behind Television Center, Dharampura - 1, Jagdalpur, Police Station, Tahsil And District Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh.

4 - Executive Engineer CREDA, Regional Office, Main Road, Behind Janpad Panchayat Office, Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

5 - District Incharge CREDA, Collectorate Building, District Officer, Bijapur, District Bijapur Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s)

(Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery)

For Petitioner(s)

:

None

For Respondent/

State

For Respondents 2 to

:

Dr. Arham Siddique, Panel Lawyer

Mr. Harshwardhan Parganiha, Advocate

SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 26/09/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Ratensh Kumar Agarwal, Advocate appears and pleads no instructions on behalf of the petitioner.

2. In view of the above, the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead