Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/406/2023 of SAVITRI Vs PITAMBAR Ram on 25 September 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 406 of 2023 1 - Savitri W/o Late Sahadan Ram Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Kasadohar, Jagdishpur, Police Station/tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ganesh S/o Late Sahadan Ram Aged About 23 Years R/o Village
CGHC010144212023
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 406 of 2023
1 - Savitri W/o Late Sahadan Ram Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Kasadohar, Jagdishpur, Police Station/tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ganesh S/o Late Sahadan Ram Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Kasadohar, Jagdishpur, Police Station/tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 3 - Jayshree S/o Late Sahadan Ram Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Kasadohar, Jagdishpur, Police Station/tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ramdular S/o Late Sahadan Ram Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Kasadohar, Jagdishpur, Police Station/tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 5 - Radha D/o Late Sahadan Ram Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Kasadohar, Jagdishpur, Police Station/tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 6 - Devanti D/o Late Sahadan Ram Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Kasadohar, Jagdishpur, Police Station/tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Pitambar Ram S/o Late Bulanghiya Rajvar Aged About 78 Years R/o Village Kasadohar, Jagdishpur, Police Station/tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS)
For Petitioner(s)
:
None
For Respondent(s) :
Ms. Richa Sahu, Panel Lawyer
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Order On Board
13/12/2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioners on repeated calls and no representation is made on behalf of the petitioners even when the case is called.
2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. S Sd/- -------(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Sagrika