Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/899/2026 of SHEKH MOHAMMAD Vs CHHATTISGARH RAJYA WAKF BOARD on 25 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41861 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 899 of 2026 1 - Shekh Mohammad S/o Mohammad Khadim Aged About 65 Years R/o Dargah Luthra Sarif, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Haji Ikhlak Kha Ashrafi S/o Late Nawab Khan Aged About 57 Years R/o Dargah Luthra Sharif,
CGHC010338192026
2026:CGHC:41861
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 899 of 2026
1 - Shekh Mohammad S/o Mohammad Khadim Aged About 65 Years R/o Dargah Luthra Sarif, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
2 - Haji Ikhlak Kha Ashrafi S/o Late Nawab Khan Aged About 57 Years R/o Dargah Luthra Sharif, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Applicants
versus
1 - Chhattisgarh Rajya Wakf Board Through Ceo, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Intejamiya Committee Dargah Luthra Sarif, Through Sadar/
Mutawalli, Saiyyad Akbar, Aged About 47 Years S/o Marhum Saiyyad Anwar Bakshi, R/o Bhartiya Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Non-applicants
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Applicants
: Mr. Syed Mohammad Sohail Afzal,
Advocate
For Respective Non-
applicants
: Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 26.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This MCC has been preferred by the applicants seeking restoration of WPC No.1919/2022. The said writ petition came to be dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 10.07.2026
as neither the applicants nor counsel appeared when the matter was called for hearing. The applicants have explained the circumstances which led to the non-appearance on the said date and prayed for restoration of the writ petition to its original file.
2. Upon due consideration of the grounds urged in the application and being satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for the applicants’ non-appearance, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice require that the writ petition be restored.
3. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. Resultantly, WPC No.1919/2022 is restored to its original number subject to deposit of costs of Rs.2,000/- payable to the High Court Bar Association Library Fund.
Sd/--
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Yogesh