Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/2484/2023 of VIVEK SHUKLA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 25 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41907 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2484 of 2023 1 - Vivek Shukla S/o Narendra Shukla Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Khaira, Tahsil- Nandghat, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Gagan Giri Goswami S/o Chandrashekhar Giri Goswami Aged About 25 Years R/o
CGHC010174842023
2026:CGHC:41907
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 2484 of 2023
1 - Vivek Shukla S/o Narendra Shukla Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Khaira, Tahsil- Nandghat, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Gagan Giri Goswami S/o Chandrashekhar Giri Goswami Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Hinchhapur, Tahsil Patharia, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District :
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
Collector Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Nawagarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Nandghat, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Bajpai,
Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State
: Mr. Vivek Verma, G.A.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 26/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned notice/order dated 26.05.2023 (Annexure P/9) passed by the Tahsildar, Nandghat and the eviction proceedings initiated by the revenue authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the authorities to act in accordance with law and afford full opportunity of hearing to the petitioners before initiating any demolition/eviction or other coercive action against their source of livelihood/Dhaba/eatery. 10.3 That, if the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper call the records pertaining to petitioner's case. 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other order which may be deed fit and proper in favour of the petitioner..”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions from the petitioner in the matter.
3. No objection has been raised from other side.
4. In view of above submission, the petition is dismissed for want of instructions. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat