Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA on 28 October 2015

Cites 0, Cited by 0

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

NEW DELHI

Dated 28th October, 2015

Petition No. 25 of 2013

Reliance Communication Ltd.

…Petitioner

Vs.

Union of India

…Respondent

Petition No. 138 of 2013

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi

…Petitioner

Vs.

Union of India

…Respondent

BEFORE:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM, CHAIRPERSON

HON’BLE MR. KULDIP SINGH, MEMBER

HON’BLE MR.B.B.SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER

For Petitioner

: Mr. Navin Chawla, Advocate

Ms. Manali Singhal, Advocate

Mr. Santosh Sachin, Advocate

For Respondent

: Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Advocate

Mr. K.P.S. Kohli, Advocate

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate

Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate

Ms. Neha Singh, Advocate

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

These two petitions are allowed for the reasons stated in and in the same terms as the judgment dated 28.10.2015 in petition no.24 of 2013 (Reliance Telecom Ltd. Vs. Union of India).

….……………. (Aftab Alam) Chairperson

..………………. (Kuldip Singh) Member

...….……………. (B.B. Srivastava) Member sks

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead