Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/885/2023 of NIRANJAN Vs LATELU on 25 September 2026
2026:CGHC:42024 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 885 of 2023 1 - Niranjan S/o Dayaram Kalar (Jaiswal) Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara, Gramin, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Latelu S/o
CGHC010363272023
2026:CGHC:42024
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 885 of 2023
1 - Niranjan S/o Dayaram Kalar (Jaiswal) Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara, Gramin, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Latelu S/o Shriram Ji Aged About 52 Years Kalar (Jaiswal), R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara Gramin, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.)
2 - Gangaram S/o Ramchand Kalar (Jaiswal) Aged About 76 Years R/o Village Kodwa, Tahsil Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara Gramin, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)
3 - Baldevsingh S/o Sudhasingh Aged About 63 Years Caste Kamboj, R/o Laidar, Pirjada, Post Khedi, Gulam Ali, Tahsil Shivan District Kaithal (Haryana), At Present Address Nipaniya, Tahsil Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara, Gramin, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)
4 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
None.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Siddhant Tiwari, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 26/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.
2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Judge Vaishali