Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5772/2022 of MORDHWAJ SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 25 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41906 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5772 of 2022 1 - Mordhwaj Sahu S/o Shri Kartikram Sahu Aged About 35 Years Working As P. G. T. Lecturer (Physic) At Eklavya Adarsh Awasiy Vidyalaya Karpawand, Block- Bakawand, District- Bastar At Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh.
CGHC010412542022
2026:CGHC:41906
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5772 of 2022
1 - Mordhwaj Sahu S/o Shri Kartikram Sahu Aged About 35 Years Working As P. G. T. Lecturer (Physic) At Eklavya Adarsh Awasiy Vidyalaya Karpawand, Block- Bakawand, District- Bastar At Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Scheduled Tribes And Scheduled Cast Development, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District :
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
2 - Collector And President District Level Chhattisgarh Triable Development And Educational Institude Eklavya Adarsh Awasiy Vidyalaya Karpawand, Block- Bakawand, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Assistant Commissioner District Level, Triable Cast Development Residential And Educational Institute Committee, Jagdalpur, District :
Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Digitally
signed by
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
4 - The Principal Eklavya Adarsh Awasiy Vidyalaya Karpawand, Block- Bakawand District-Baster At Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State
: Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Panel
Lawyer.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 26/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to consider and decide pending application of the petitioner, within stipulated period. 10.2 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the cost of the petition may be given.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh in case exigency arises.
3. Permission is granted.
4. No objection has been raised from other side.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat