Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRCA/1533/2026 of PRIYANSH MAHANT Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41838 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1533 of 2026 Priyansh Mahant S/o Late Amardas Mahant, Aged About 20 Years R/o Near Old College, P. S. - Champa, Dist. - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) ... Applicant (s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P. S. - Khamhardih,
CGHC010353512026
2026:CGHC:41838
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 1533 of 2026
Priyansh Mahant S/o Late Amardas Mahant, Aged About 20 Years R/o Near Old College, P. S. - Champa, Dist. - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.)
... Applicant (s)
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P. S. - Khamhardih, Dist. - Raipur
(C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Applicant
:
Mr. Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate
For State
:
Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 25/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On an objection being raised by learned counsel for the State that applicant has not filed application for grant of anticipatory bail before the learned Sessions Court for alleged commission of offence under Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and, therefore, this bail application is not maintainable, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file application before the appropriate forum first.
2. In view of submission of learned counsel for the applicant, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/--/---/-/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen