Chhattisgarh High Court
REVP/259/2026 of DINESH KUMAR SAHU Vs SMT. HEENA SAHU on 24 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41699-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 259 of 2026 Dinesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Chamru Ram Sahu. Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Chhatauna, P.S. Chakerbhata, Distt. Bilaspur, (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus Smt. Heena Sahu W/o Dinesh Kumar Sahu, D/o Shri
CGHC010332062026
2026:CGHC:41699-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
REVP No. 259 of 2026
Dinesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Chamru Ram Sahu. Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Chhatauna, P.S. Chakerbhata, Distt. Bilaspur, (C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
Smt. Heena Sahu W/o Dinesh Kumar Sahu, D/o Shri Ramnath Sahu, Aged About 33 Years R/o Sahu, Kirana Store, Village Jhabar, P.S. Deepka Distt.
Korba (C.G.)
... Respondent
For Petitioner
:
Mr. B.L. Dembra, Advocate
For Respondent
:
Mr. Palash Agrawal, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput, Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on I.A. No.1/2026, an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for review.
2. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 506 days in filing the Review Petition is hereby condoned.
3. The present Review Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Rule 90 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 seeking review of the order dated 28.02.2025 passed by this Court in FA(MAT) No. 168 of 2024.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and went through the review petition and the annexed documents.
5. After going through the records of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the judgment under review, we do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the judgment dated 28.02.2025 passed in FA(MAT) No.168/2024. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge Prakash