Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/567/2026 of RAJENDRA KUMAR Vs SAVITRI on 24 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41697-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 567 of 2026 1 - Rajendra Kumar Son Of Kishundas Bairagi Aged About 40 Years Resident Of Village Kuli, Teshil - Masturi, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Savitri D/o Shri Bisahu Das Bairagi
CGHC010200922026
2026:CGHC:41697-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 567 of 2026
1 - Rajendra Kumar Son Of Kishundas Bairagi Aged About 40 Years Resident Of Village Kuli, Teshil - Masturi, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
... Applicant(s)
versus
1 - Savitri D/o Shri Bisahu Das Bairagi Aged About 35 Years Resident Of Village Kuli, Tehsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Applicant
:
Mr. Rishi Sahu, Advocate
For Respondent No.1
:
None
For Respondent No2./State
:
Ms. Vithika Choubey, P.L.
Hon’ble Shri Justice
Sachin Singh Rajput
Hon’ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
Sachin Singh Rajput
, J.
25.09.2026
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI
YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026, an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration.
2. Upon due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, we are of the considered opinion that sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for condoning the delay. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01/2026 is allowed and the delay of 86 days in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.
3. Also heard on the application seeking restoration of F.A. No. 23 of 2024 to its original number.
4. The present MCC has been filed seeking restoration of F.A. No. 23 of 2024, which was dismissed pursuant to the peremptory order dated 10.11.2025.
5. Upon due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the instant MCC is allowed. Consequently, F.A. No. 23 of 2024 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge
Judge Ruchi