Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/428/2026 of SHRI SUDAMA PRASAD Vs DR. AVINASH TRIPATHI on 24 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41696-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 428 of 2026 1 - Shri Sudama Prasad S/o- Sharda Prasad Shukla Aged About 68 Years R/o Green Park Colony, Jarhabhata, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Dr. Avinash Tripathi S/o Dr. Lal
CGHC010104542026
2026:CGHC:41696-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 428 of 2026
1 - Shri Sudama Prasad S/o- Sharda Prasad Shukla Aged About 68 Years R/o Green Park Colony, Jarhabhata, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Applicant(s)
versus
1 - Dr. Avinash Tripathi S/o Dr. Lal Bahadur Tripathi R/o- Gouri Ganesh Colony, Shubham Vihar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Applicant
: Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate
For Respondent
: Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice
Sachin Singh Rajput
Hon’ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
Sachin Singh Rajput
, J.
25.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026, an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration. RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV
2. Upon due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, we are of the considered opinion that sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for condoning the delay. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01/2026 is allowed and the delay of 10 days in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.
3. Also heard on the application seeking restoration of F.A. No. 176 of 2018 to its original number.
4. The present MCC has been filed seeking restoration of F.A. No. 176 of 2018, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 30.01.2026.
5. The present application is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondent.
6. Upon due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the instant MCC is allowed. Consequently, F.A. No. 176 of 2018 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge
Judge Ruchi